سا
asking that cons on
Should
be given
to the Moinability of amending the Ordinance (No 6 9 1937) in certami particulars. In amending Ordinance is
Submitted at (1)
how
decision
Efpeted dysctions
Charl
are
Whe ther
and
it is for
thus the amends now
Sufficiently comprehensive. The Share Proinance (No 6 of 1932)
Summarised in Mr. Roberts. Wrays minute
92583/6/32. In his
of 19.1.33 minute
on
4 19/2/34 1/2. Roberts Wray indicates his opinion the ordinances
that through in
they how
us
Should
Stand
be allowed.
they
are
not ideal,
Ordinance 22 of 1933
cumending Section 17 of Ordinance 19 1932
was "allowed" at (2) on
? Subject to
11704/14/33 Funeral.
obson 9 9.D. Signify
hon - disallowance of Ordinance 21 of 1933
(u/e (1)
as
lundu
on
amended
this fill). [The principal Ordce:
Cause
• into force_ the Proclamation w/c (2)]
Mr. Bader
on 20.11.33
23-4-34 ho observations
WysBeyn
Went.
N.
24
23/4/34
holid
hiby
4/5/34
3
To H.K. 142. (lamed) 9/3.
2 MAY 1934
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.